Accusations resurface as former aides describe Meghan’s “psycho moments,” while her team defends her against claims of creating a hostile work environment

Meghan Markle finds herself in the spotlight once again, facing serious allegations regarding her treatment of staff during her time as a working royal. A former aide has come forward, claiming that Meghan had moments of intense frustration, often leaving employees feeling “like s**t.” This new wave of accusations has sparked a renewed debate about the Duchess of Sussex’s conduct behind palace walls.

The source, who preferred to remain anonymous, recounted witnessing unsettling interactions where staff members were “chewed up in person and over the phone.” These revelations arrive amidst a complicated backdrop, as Meghan reportedly struggled with mental health challenges during this tumultuous period. The former aide acknowledged the difficult circumstances surrounding the couple’s departure from royal duties, suggesting that Meghan’s reactions might have stemmed from the immense pressure she was under, including feelings of isolation and suicidal thoughts.

Notably, this isn’t the first time Meghan has been criticized for her treatment of staff. In 2018, Jason Knauf, her press secretary at the time, filed complaints regarding her behaviour. This past incident adds weight to the current allegations, as it underscores a pattern that some former staffers are now recounting.

One former employee reflected on the historic nature of the royal treatment, suggesting that difficult personalities have long existed within the monarchy. They cited examples of past royals, such as Princess Margaret and Prince Andrew, who exhibited troubling behaviour without facing the same level of scrutiny. “There have been plenty of difficult royals over the years,” the source stated. “Meghan’s bad moments were amplified and distorted after Megxit.”

Another individual who worked closely with Meghan during the lead-up to her wedding described her as a “classic narcissist.” This description has sparked further discussion about the nature of Meghan’s interactions with those around her, suggesting that her personality traits may have contributed to a toxic work environment.

Further allegations surfaced regarding a florist who claimed they faced a barrage of verbal abuse from Meghan over a minor issue related to a bouquet. This incident reportedly resulted in the florist vowing never to work with her again, illustrating the lengths to which some employees felt compelled to distance themselves from the Duchess. The source claimed that Meghan treated her vendors and staff as though they were “tradesmen who could be treated like s**t,” indicating a lack of respect for those providing her services.

These fresh allegations come in stark contrast to previous claims made by Meghan’s team, which labeled similar accusations as “fabrications.” GB News reported that staff members had denied the use of the nickname “Duchess Difficult,” which had previously been attached to Meghan in various media reports. In response to the ongoing scrutiny, her team has emphasized that these claims do not reflect the reality of her character or her interactions with employees.

As the conversation around Meghan’s conduct continues to unfold, it raises questions about the scrutiny placed on public figures, particularly women, within the royal family. The accusations have ignited a broader debate about mental health, the pressures of public life, and the complexities of navigating personal struggles in the spotlight.

Analysis:

Political:

The renewed scrutiny surrounding Meghan Markle’s behaviour toward staff highlights the intricate dynamics of celebrity and royalty in today’s political climate. The allegations against her come amid ongoing debates about mental health and accountability, especially for women in high-pressure roles. Meghan’s position as a member of the royal family adds a layer of complexity, as public expectations often clash with the realities of personal struggles.

Social:

The social implications of these accusations are significant, reflecting broader conversations about workplace culture and mental health. Meghan’s alleged behaviour raises questions about the expectations placed on women, particularly those in high-profile positions, to maintain a façade of grace and composure. The narrative surrounding Meghan can be seen as a microcosm of societal judgments directed at women who display emotional vulnerability, especially in high-stress environments.

Racial:

The allegations against Meghan also resonate within the context of race and privilege. As a biracial woman, she has faced unique challenges and scrutiny, often highlighted by the media. Discussions about her treatment of staff can intersect with broader conversations about the experiences of women of colour in powerful roles and the different standards they are held to compared to their white counterparts.

Gender:

The gendered nature of the criticisms directed at Meghan is noteworthy. As a woman in the public eye, her emotional responses have been scrutinized more harshly than those of her male counterparts. The conversation around her alleged “psycho moments” reflects a societal tendency to pathologize women’s behaviour when they display assertiveness or vulnerability. This reinforces stereotypes about women in power and their capacity for leadership.

Economic:

The economic implications of these allegations are substantial, particularly concerning Meghan’s brand and potential future endeavours. The perception of her as a difficult employer could impact her business ventures, partnerships, and public image. The discussion around her treatment of staff may deter potential collaborators and clients, highlighting the interconnectedness of personal conduct and professional success in the public sphere.

Technological:

In today’s digital age, the rapid dissemination of information plays a crucial role in shaping public perception. The allegations against Meghan have gained traction through social media, where opinions can spread quickly and influence narratives. This technological landscape allows for the swift amplification of claims, both positive and negative, impacting the reputations of public figures in real-time.