A critical online comment could lead to years in prison for Lagos entrepreneur
In an unprecedented legal battle that has captured the attention of Nigeria and sparked widespread public outcry, a Nigerian woman may face imprisonment following her online critique of a can of tomato puree. This case not only underscores the complexities of digital expression in the country but also ignites discussions on the balance between corporate reputation and the right to free speech.
Chioma Okoli, a 39-year-old entrepreneur from Lagos, found herself in legal turmoil after posting a review on Facebook about Nagiko Tomato Mix, a product by Erisco Foods Limited. With a following of 18,000, Okoli’s comment that the tomato puree was “too sweet” for her liking, and subsequent jest that the product was akin to “pure sugar,” led to her arrest and a series of legal challenges under Nigeria’s Cyber Crime Prohibition Act.
The response from Erisco Foods was swift and severe. Accusing Okoli of making “malicious allegations” that purportedly damaged its business, the company’s lawsuit seeks an astonishing 5 billion naira (over $3 million) in damages. This situation has escalated to a point where Okoli, now pregnant with her fourth child, faces up to three years in jail, a 7 million naira fine, or both, under one charge; and a potentially harsher seven-year sentence under a separate charge of conspiracy.
The controversy surrounding Okoli’s post and subsequent arrest highlights the broader implications of Nigeria’s cybercrime laws on freedom of speech and the press. Her ordeal began with overnight detention in a leaky police cell and has since spiralled into a legal saga with two court cases: one criminal and the other civil.
The public reaction has been one of solidarity with Okoli, with many viewing her case as an unjust persecution for exercising her freedom of expression. Protests and social media campaigns have emerged, advocating for her rights and calling for a boycott of Erisco Foods’ products.
Despite the daunting challenges ahead, Okoli’s legal team remains determined to fight what they consider a David vs. Goliath battle in court. With a countersuit filed against both Erisco and the police for violating Okoli’s constitutional rights, the team aims to not only clear her name but also set a precedent for the protection of free speech in Nigeria.
This case raises critical questions about the limits of freedom of expression in the digital age and the potential for corporate entities to suppress criticism through legal means. As Okoli prepares for her upcoming court dates, the outcome of this legal battle will likely have far-reaching implications for digital rights and corporate accountability in Nigeria.
