Ashley Simbarashe Maparura, with 68 prior convictions, receives UK asylum; controversy surrounds the decision amid his criminal history

Ashley Simbarashe Maparura, a 34-year-old man from Zimbabwe, recently appeared at Northampton Crown Court facing new weapons charges, despite a troubling criminal record. Maparura has been granted asylum in the UK, sparking a significant legal and ethical debate given his extensive history of criminal activities, including drugs, violence, and blackmail.

The court session revealed Maparura’s history of 68 convictions across various counties, showcasing a pattern of aggressive and unlawful behaviour. His latest court appearance stems from an incident in Corby, where he was captured on CCTV carrying a hammer during an early morning disturbance behind local shops.

During the incident on February 16, alongside an associate who held a wrench, Maparura was involved in a commotion that quickly escalated. The situation cooled when the intended victim chose not to cooperate with the police, leading only to charges of possession of offensive weapons.

Maparura’s criminal record is daunting. It includes multiple drug offences, episodes of violence, and instances where he used weapons in public spaces. His record also highlights a 2017 knife possession charge and various failures to comply with court orders. His persistent involvement in criminal activities continued despite multiple incarcerations.

In one notable episode, Maparura was caught carrying drugs at a roadside stop. Another significant incident occurred at a Currys store in Kettering, where he stole vacuum cleaners and used an incapacitant spray, which led to a one-year prison sentence.

Despite these numerous convictions, Maparura was granted asylum two months ago, allowing him to remain in the UK legally. This decision has come under scrutiny, especially considering the stringent policies of the Nationality and Borders Act 2022. This act stipulates that asylum should generally be denied to those convicted of serious crimes posing a threat to public safety.

Maparura’s defense, represented by Barrister Rajesh Pabary, argued that his criminal behavior was partly driven by his initial inability to work legally in the UK, pushing him towards illegal means of income. Pabary highlighted Maparura’s recent efforts to reform, including drug rehabilitation and vocational training attempts.

Judge Rupert Mayo, addressing the court, emphasized the severity of Maparura’s criminal history and its impact on public safety. Despite acknowledging the legal provision allowing Maparura to stay in the UK, Judge Mayo sentenced him to an additional year and four months in prison for his latest offenses.

The case has raised questions about the balance between humanitarian protection and public safety, especially given the harsh human rights environment in Zimbabwe, as noted by organizations like Amnesty International. The decision to grant Maparura asylum despite his record reflects the complex interplay of international law, human rights, and domestic legal standards