Opposition leader testifies that Prime Minister Netanyahu had been informed for months about the erosion of Israel’s deterrence but failed to act, appearing indifferent to the warnings

On August 29, 2024, Opposition Leader Yair Lapid testified before an unofficial citizens’ commission of inquiry in Tel Aviv, accusing Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of negligence leading up to the October 7 Hamas attack. Lapid detailed how Netanyahu was repeatedly warned by security officials about weakening deterrence and the growing threat from Hamas, yet failed to take action.

Lapid described a joint briefing with Netanyahu in which he appeared “bored and indifferent” to the grave security warnings provided by officials. He asserted that Netanyahu and other high-ranking officials were well aware of the deteriorating security situation and the risk of an imminent attack, despite claims to the contrary.

The opposition leader recounted receiving a detailed security briefing from Shin Bet Chief Ronen Bar in July 2023, which highlighted the repercussions of the judicial overhaul and its impact on national security. This overhaul, criticized by many as an attempt at a “coup d’état,” was reportedly causing internal divisions and weakening Israel’s security posture.

Lapid emphasized that security warnings about Hamas’s intentions were communicated not only to Netanyahu but also to other key figures, including President Isaac Herzog and Defense Minister Yoav Gallant. He noted that Gallant, who was later dismissed and then reinstated under public pressure, had also warned of the dangers posed by the judicial overhaul and the potential impact on Israel’s security.

The testimony pointed to an August 2023 briefing where senior defence officials, including IDF Chief of Staff Herzi Halevi, reported that Iran and various terrorist groups were exploiting Israel’s internal divisions and perceived weakness. Despite these warnings, Netanyahu allegedly did not take decisive action.

Lapid’s testimony aims to challenge the narrative that the Israeli government was blindsided by the October 7 attack, asserting that there were ample warnings and opportunities to prevent or mitigate the disaster. The commission of inquiry, established by survivors and victims’ groups, is investigating the failure to adequately respond to and prepare for the Hamas assault.

Analysis:

Political: Lapid’s accusations against Netanyahu highlight ongoing political tensions and accountability issues surrounding the October 7 attack. The testimony could influence public perception of Netanyahu’s leadership and the handling of national security.

Social: The discussion of Netanyahu’s alleged indifference underscores the broader societal impact of the attack, including the sense of betrayal and frustration among the public and survivors. It reflects the intense scrutiny of government actions and their consequences on civilian safety.

Racial: The impact of internal Israeli divisions on national security has racial and ethnic dimensions, particularly regarding the treatment and perception of different groups within Israel. The fallout from the attack may exacerbate existing social and ethnic tensions.

Gender: Gender dynamics are less directly addressed in this context, but the effects of the security failures and political responses likely impact women and families disproportionately, given the broader societal consequences of the conflict.

Economic: The fallout from the attack and the political turmoil surrounding it have economic implications, including the cost of security measures, potential economic instability, and the financial burden on families affected by the violence.