Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky announces China’s commitment to not supplying arms to Russia, following talks between Ukrainian and Chinese officials

On July 24, 2024, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky confirmed that China has pledged not to supply weapons to Russia amidst the ongoing conflict in Ukraine. This assurance followed a meeting in Guangzhou between Ukrainian Foreign Minister Dmytro Kuleba and his Chinese counterpart, Wang Yi.

Zelensky’s statement comes as a significant development in Ukraine’s diplomatic efforts to secure support against Russian aggression. “There is a clear signal that China supports Ukraine’s territorial integrity and sovereignty,” Zelensky stated. He also highlighted that Chinese leader Xi Jinping had previously assured him of China’s stance on not providing arms to Russia.

China, which has maintained a neutral stance publicly while strengthening economic ties with Russia, has been a major source of dual-use goods for the Russian defence sector. Despite denials of directly supplying arms, the U.S. has accused Beijing of providing substantial behind-the-scenes support to Moscow and has threatened additional sanctions against China.

The recent talks between Kuleba and Wang Yi marked Kuleba’s first visit to China since Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine. Kyiv has previously appealed to Beijing to leverage its influence over Moscow to help end the war. However, these appeals have largely been met with Beijing’s indifference, particularly regarding a global peace summit held in Switzerland in June, which China did not attend.

China had proposed its own peace plan, advocating for a conference that would be acknowledged by both Ukraine and Russia. This proposal was met with criticism from Zelensky, who accused China of undermining international peace efforts. In response, Beijing rebuked Zelensky’s allegations.

Kuleba’s visit also included discussions on Ukraine’s readiness to engage in negotiations with Russia, contingent upon Moscow’s willingness to participate “in good faith,” though such readiness from Russia remains unobserved at this time.

Analysis:

Political: China’s assurance to Ukraine is a notable shift in diplomatic relations, potentially impacting global perceptions of Beijing’s role in the conflict. The move could also influence international diplomatic dynamics and negotiations surrounding the war.

Social: The confirmation from China may be seen as a significant morale boost for Ukraine, while potentially exacerbating tensions between China and Western nations that criticize Beijing’s broader support for Russia.

Racial: The geopolitical manoeuvring between Ukraine, China, and Russia reflects the complex international relations that intersect with national identities and regional conflicts. The involvement of major powers like China in the Ukraine conflict underscores the global stakes and the varying perspectives on sovereignty and aggression.

Gender: While the primary focus of the report is on international diplomacy and conflict, the roles of key figures like President Zelensky and Foreign Minister Kuleba highlight the impact of leadership and gender dynamics in high-stakes negotiations and conflict resolution.

Economic: China’s stance could affect its economic relations with both Ukraine and Russia. The ongoing conflict and China’s role as a key economic partner for Russia add layers of complexity to global trade and economic sanctions.