Wicked For Good earns praise for cast and visuals but critics question the sequel’s strength

The first reviews for Wicked For Good have arrived and the early critical response indicates a notably cooler reaction compared with the reception to the first instalment of the musical adaptation. The sequel currently holds a rating of seventy two percent on the Tomatometer, based on seventy two published reviews. While this figure still positions the film in the Fresh category, it falls short of the eighty eight percent achieved by its predecessor.

Audience reaction has been considerably stronger. After fan screenings held the previous evening, the film scored ninety seven percent on the audience generated Popcornmeter. The contrast between the two measurements highlights a significant divide between early audience enthusiasm and the more reserved tone of professional reviews.

One of the main concerns raised by reviewers relates to the decision to divide the adaptation into two full length features. Several critics suggest the second half of the narrative does not contain sufficient material to sustain a separate film. Although the cast, visual style and musical performances have received consistent praise, some critics conclude that the continuation lacks the narrative clarity and momentum of the first instalment.

Despite those reservations, expectations for the film’s commercial performance remain high. The strong following of the original stage production, combined with the success of the first adaptation released last November, is likely to draw a large audience. Many viewers who saw the first film are expected to return to watch the conclusion of the story, while the property has also attracted new fans since its cinematic debut.

Among the positive critical responses, The Hollywood Reporter highlighted the emotional range brought by Ariana Grande, stating that she adds depth and resonance to the character and contributes significantly to the tone of the film. Variety echoed the appreciation for the lead performances and noted that the film addresses a common criticism of the stage show by expanding the scenes shared by the central pair. According to this review, the final section of the story feels more complete and more balanced than some viewers may expect.

Other publications have taken a more critical view. The Wrap described the sequel as one of the more disappointing examples of a planned second part and compared it unfavourably with other multi film adaptations. The review commented on the difficulty of maintaining narrative tension and emotional stakes when the material is divided in advance.

Further mixed opinions appear in several trade outlets. AwardsWatch emphasised the high quality of the performances delivered by Cynthia Erivo and Ariana Grande but questioned whether the continuation offers enough new material to warrant its structure as a separate feature. Slant Magazine assessed the film as stretched and breathless, with limited emotional impact even for viewers with strong attachment to the musical.

While the range of responses may temper expectations among some cinema goers, the film’s strong existing fan base and the continuing popularity of the musical suggest it will remain one of the major releases of the year. The positive audience reaction from early screenings indicates sustained public interest, setting the stage for a wide debate over the adaptation and its conclusion.