In response to pm Modi’s assertive stance on terrorism, the US emphasizes dialogue and non-interference in India-Pakistan issues.
In a recent press briefing, US State Department spokesperson Matthew Miller addressed questions about Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s firm statements on tackling terrorism. Miller clarified that the United States would remain neutral and not interfere in the escalating rhetoric between India and Pakistan. This stance comes after Modi’s controversial remark about eliminating terrorists by entering their homes, which he voiced alongside Defence Minister Rajnath Singh.
Miller emphasized the US position of promoting dialogue over conflict. “As I have said before, the United States is not going to get into the middle of this. But we do encourage both India and Pakistan to avoid escalation and find a resolution through dialogue,” he stated. This response underlines the delicate balance the US seeks to maintain in South Asian geopolitical tensions.
Embed from Getty ImagesThe backdrop to these statements includes Modi and Singh’s vocal approach to national security. Singh recently affirmed that India would pursue terrorists even across borders if they threatened Indian peace. Echoing this, Modi asserted at a Uttarakhand rally that under his leadership, the Indian government has been proactive in countering terrorism directly, even if it means crossing into enemy territory.
Further, Miller responded to queries about whether the US would consider sanctions against India regarding alleged overseas operations targeting specific individuals linked to separatist movements. He chose not to speculate on future sanctions but made it clear that such discussions are typically held confidentially.
These exchanges highlight the ongoing challenges in the region, with India taking a hard stance on terrorism and the US advocating for restraint and diplomacy. The discussion also touched upon other geopolitical issues, including the US’s response to other international matters, reflecting a consistent policy of non-preemptive commentary on sanction decisions.
This stance by the US reflects a broader strategy of encouraging peaceful resolutions and maintaining a distance from direct involvement in the conflicts of other sovereign nations. As tensions continue to simmer in South Asia, the international community watches closely, hoping for peaceful dialogues to prevail over aggressive posturing.