Legal battle unfolds over Duke’s visa application following revelations in his memoir ‘Spare’

In a contentious legal showdown, US federal lawyers have defended their decision to grant Prince Harry visa despite revelations in his memoir detailing past drug use, igniting a debate over immigration law and celebrity status.

The Duke of Sussex‘s memoir, “Spare,” candidly discusses his experimentation with cocaine, marijuana, and magic mushrooms, sparking controversy over whether such admissions should impact his visa status. While conservative think tank The Heritage Foundation has challenged the Department for Homeland Security’s decision to grant Harry a visa, arguing that his drug use should disqualify him under federal law, lawyers for the Biden administration have countered that the memoir alone is not sufficient proof of drug use.

During a court hearing in Washington DC, John Bardo, representing the Biden administration, emphasized that statements made in a book do not constitute sworn testimony or irrefutable proof. He underscored that Prince Harry is one of many foreign nationals entering the US legally and cautioned against assuming the accuracy of statements made in a memoir.

However, Samuel Dewey, representing The Heritage Foundation, contended that Prince Harry’s admissions in “Spare” should be taken seriously, asserting that they constitute a valid admission of drug use. Dewey raised concerns about potential special treatment afforded to celebrities, suggesting that the government’s handling of Harry’s visa raises questions about fairness and accountability.

The legal battle has drawn attention to the intersection of immigration law, celebrity status, and personal disclosure. Critics argue that Prince Harry’s admissions in his memoir, coupled with his ongoing presence and activities in the US, warrant transparency regarding his visa application and potential waivers granted.

Amidst the legal wrangling, questions have emerged about the process by which Prince Harry obtained his visa, with speculation over whether he disclosed his drug use on his application and, if so, how it was addressed by immigration authorities. District Judge Carl J. Nichols has raised probing questions about the government’s duty to investigate potential discrepancies in Harry’s visa application, hinting at broader concerns about accountability and transparency in the immigration process.

As the legal battle unfolds, the public eagerly awaits Judge Nichols’ ruling, which promises to shed light on the intricacies of Prince Harry’s visa application and the broader implications for immigration policy and celebrity privilege in the United States