Sen. Lindsey Graham and Nebraska Republicans seek to consolidate Electoral votes in a bid to boost Trump’s chances against Harris

A close ally of Donald Trump is intensifying efforts to alter Nebraska’s Electoral College law, aiming to award all of the state’s electoral votes to the candidate who wins the statewide popular vote. This push, led by Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), comes as Trump faces Democrat Kamala Harris in a tightly contested presidential race, where every electoral vote could prove crucial.

Currently, Nebraska and Maine are the only states that allocate their electoral votes by congressional district. In Nebraska, this system has allowed one of the state’s five votes to remain competitive for Democrats, a scenario that could benefit Trump in a critical election year.

During a recent meeting with Nebraska GOP lawmakers, Graham emphasized the significance of even a single electoral vote, stating, “That one electoral vote could be the difference between Harris being president and not.” He labelled a potential Harris presidency as a “disaster for Nebraska and the world,” underscoring the urgency of the situation as Election Day approaches.

Despite discussions earlier this year, the proposed change had not garnered enough support in the state legislature. However, with Trump and Harris locked in a tight race across several battleground states, momentum appears to be shifting. The five Republican members of Nebraska’s congressional delegation have issued a letter advocating for the change, asserting that “the state should speak with a united voice in presidential elections.”

The political landscape indicates that Nebraska’s 2nd Congressional District, which swung for Joe Biden in the last election, could play a pivotal role. If Harris secures victories in traditionally Democratic states like Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania while Trump wins key Sun Belt states, the Electoral College could potentially favor Harris by a narrow margin of 269-268. In such a scenario, Nebraska’s 2nd District could provide Harris with the crucial 270th vote or lead to a 269-269 tie, shifting the decision to the House of Representatives—a scenario that historically favours Trump.

Nebraska Governor Jim Pillen, a Republican, has indicated his willingness to call a special legislative session if he receives clear support from at least 33 lawmakers, the minimum needed for passage in Nebraska’s unicameral legislature.

Meanwhile, Nebraska Democrats have mobilized in defence of the current electoral vote distribution, displaying yard signs that emphasize the significance of their district amid a sea of Republican support. They argue that out-of-state interests should not dictate changes to a longstanding electoral process, especially as ballots are already being distributed.

The Nebraska Democratic Party has expressed pride in state senators who have remained committed to preserving the electoral voice of Nebraskans, vowing to continue opposing any attempts to alter the system.

Analysis

Political Perspective

This push highlights the ongoing strategic manoeuvres by both parties as they approach the election. Trump’s allies recognize the importance of every electoral vote, especially in a race that could hinge on a few key districts. Altering electoral laws in a battleground state reflects a broader strategy to maximize electoral advantages.

Social Perspective

The potential change raises questions about electoral fairness and representation. Critics argue that changing the rules so close to the election undermines democratic principles and could disenfranchise voters who are accustomed to the existing system.

Economic Perspective

The political manoeuvring surrounding Nebraska’s electoral votes could have broader economic implications. A more polarized political environment may impact investment and economic stability, as businesses often seek predictable governance.