Biden’s move draws ire from critics, stirs national debate on inclusivity

On March 31, President Joe Biden declared the Transgender Day of Visibility, coinciding with Easter Sunday, sparking a nationwide debate. The White House, through spokesman Andrew Bates, staunchly defended the President’s decision, emphasizing Biden’s commitment to unity and the dignity of every American. Bates highlighted that despite the backlash, President Biden, celebrating Easter as a Christian, would not politicize his faith but stands firm on inclusiveness.

The declaration aimed to honour the transgender community’s courage and contributions, asserting their integral place in the nation. “You are loved. You are heard. You are understood. You belong. You are America, and my entire Administration and I have your back,” President Biden affirmed in his proclamation. This gesture, however, ignited sharp criticism from several quarters, including prominent religious figures and politicians.

Former President Donald Trump demanded an apology to Christians and Catholics, condemning the administration’s perceived disregard for Christian faith. House Speaker Mike Johnson and Franklin Graham voiced their disapproval, accusing the Biden administration of disrespecting Easter’s sacredness. State governors from Mississippi and South Dakota also expressed shock and disapproval, framing the declaration as an insult to Christian Americans.

Critics argue the administration’s choice to celebrate Transgender Day of Visibility on Easter reflects a lack of respect for religious traditions. Caitlyn Jenner, highlighting the religious significance of Easter, expressed disgust over the overlap, emphasizing, “The only thing you should be declaring on this day is ‘HE is Risen’.”

Despite these criticisms, the White House and Secretary of State Antony Blinken reiterated their support for the transgender community, acknowledging ongoing challenges and advocating for further progress towards inclusivity and respect for all individuals, regardless of their gender identity.

This declaration and the ensuing debate underscore the tensions at the intersection of politics, religion, and rights advocacy, highlighting the challenges of governance in a diverse and polarized society.