Sky-high saga unfolds as passengers debate the pros and cons of new air travel upgrade

When it comes to air travel, a multitude of annoyances can disrupt the journey – from mid-air armrest skirmishes to nerve-wracking turbulence. However, one common grievance stands out: the presence of a ‘screaming baby.’ In response to this, [Airline Name] has boldly introduced ‘adults only zones’ on their planes, becoming the first to offer such a divisive upgrade.

For a modest fee of $48, passengers over the age of 16 can secure a spot in these exclusive zones located at the front of the plane, boasting 93 seats for those seeking an undisturbed flight. Atilay Uslu, the visionary founder of Corendon, justified the move, stating, “Onboard our flights, we always strive to respond to the different needs of our customers. We also believe this can have a positive effect on parents travelling with small children, allowing them to enjoy the flight without worrying if their children are making too much noise.”

While the child-free zones cater to those yearning for a peaceful journey, opinions on the matter are sharply divided. Some passengers have welcomed the initiative, with one exclaiming, “Thank god, children are an annoyance.” Another advocate suggested expanding the concept, adding, “I would prefer drunk-obnoxious-men free zones.”

However, not everyone is on board with the idea. A dissenting voice argued, “At whose expense is this? Put kids with their parents, and discounted prices based on age and height.” Another critic expressed concern, questioning, “Let’s not only restrict air travel but also further [discourage] people from having children. Urgh, why do people hate families?”

Corendon Airlines pioneered this controversial in-flight upgrade, launching the child-free zones in November of the previous year. Notably, other airlines such as Malaysia’s AirAsia, India’s IndiGo, and Singapore’s Scoot offer similar ‘quiet zones’ for passengers seeking respite.

As the aviation industry grapples with this paradigm shift, one thing is clear – the debate over child-free zones is far from reaching a consensus.