The Duke of Sussex faces backlash as he prepares to accept a memorial award honouring a fallen war hero

 Meghan Markle and Prince Harry have come under fire for their controversial public relations tactics as Prince Harry prepares to receive the Pat Tillman Memorial Award in Hollywood on July 11. The award, named after the soldier who died in the line of duty, has sparked significant public outcry, including criticism from Tillman’s mother and a petition calling for ESPN to reconsider their decision. The petition has garnered over 70,000 signatures, questioning Harry’s suitability for such a prestigious honour given his past controversies.

Prince Harry’s nomination stems from his work as the founder of the Invictus Games, a multi-sport event for wounded, injured, and sick servicemen and women, both serving and veterans. Despite the noble cause, public reaction has been mixed, with some viewing the award as undeserved.

Daily Mail columnist Maureen Callahan voiced her disapproval of GBN America, saying, “In America, they’re laughing stocks. They’re covered in American tabloids constantly because it’s an incredible story of self-inflicted wound after self-inflicted wound. When you compare these two with the bravery, the courage, the dignity of William and Kate, especially in this very trying time for Kate and King Charles, it just all feels very sad and gross.”

A source close to Harry revealed to The Telegraph that he was taken aback by the negative response to his nomination. “Harry’s legacy with Invictus, the things he has achieved, that’s his real passion. This is the space in which he truly feels at home, it is something he deeply cares about. The reaction certainly took the shine off the award.”

In response to the backlash, ESPN released a statement defending their decision: “ESPN, with the support of the Tillman Foundation, is honouring Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex, specifically for the work of The Invictus Games Foundation as it celebrates its 10th year promoting healing through the power of sport for military service members and veterans around the world. While we understand not everyone will agree with all honorees selected for any award, The Invictus Games Foundation does incredible work and ESPN believes this is a cause worth celebrating.”

Analysis:

Political: The criticism aimed at Meghan Markle and Prince Harry highlights the complex intersection of celebrity and political influence. Their involvement in various causes often stirs debate, as their actions can be perceived as attempts to leverage their royal status for political capital. The controversy surrounding the Pat Tillman Memorial Award underscores the challenges they face in balancing their philanthropic efforts with public perception.

Social: Socially, the backlash against Harry and Meghan reflects broader societal debates about privilege and authenticity. Their high-profile lifestyle and frequent media appearances contrast sharply with the down-to-earth image they often try to project. This dichotomy fuels public scepticism and critique, especially when they receive honours traditionally reserved for individuals with more direct connections to the causes they support.

Racial: The racial dynamics at play are also significant. Meghan Markle’s presence in the royal family has been a focal point for discussions on race and representation within historically white institutions. The mixed reactions to their public endeavours can be partly attributed to ongoing racial tensions and the scrutiny they face as a biracial couple in the public eye.

Gender: Gender plays a role in the public’s reception of Meghan and Harry. Meghan, as a high-profile woman, often faces harsher criticism and scrutiny compared to her male counterparts. The public’s reaction to their PR strategies can reflect underlying gender biases, where women in the spotlight are more frequently judged for their actions and decisions.

Economical: Economically, the couple’s endeavours have significant implications. Their involvement in high-profile causes and events, like the Invictus Games, attracts substantial media coverage and public interest, which can drive donations and support for these causes. However, their perceived use of PR tactics to maintain relevance can also draw criticism, affecting their brand and potential future earnings.