Princess Kate’s uncle, Gary Goldsmith, lashes out at Meghan Markle, calling her a “laughing girl” and defending Kate against allegations of racism

Princess Kate’s uncle, Gary Goldsmith, has sparked controversy by criticizing Meghan Markle in an interview with The Times’ Saturday Magazine. Goldsmith referred to the Duchess of Sussex as “Laughing Girl” and accused her of spreading false allegations about Kate being racist. He expressed his anger over Meghan’s comments and defended Kate’s character.

Goldsmith, who gained notoriety after his appearance on Celebrity Big Brother, did not hold back in his criticism. He stated, “Laughing Girl is not good people,” and condemned Meghan for implying that Kate was racist. Goldsmith highlighted his and Kate’s diverse upbringing, asserting that such accusations were baseless and infuriating.

In the interview, Goldsmith said, “Me and Carole grew up in a community as diverse as a Woolies pick’n’mix counter. All the cultures you can think of. The idea that Laughing Girl says Kate is racist makes me furious. Kate knows her family’s roots and is proud of them. I’m sorry, but Laughing Girl is not good people.”

Goldsmith’s remarks did not end there. He also criticized Prince Harry, accusing him and Meghan of prioritizing financial gains in America. He lamented the loss of the once-close relationship between William, Harry, and Kate, attributing the rift to external factors not publicly known.

“And then you’ve got Harry. F*** me! He and that woman are chasing the American corporate dollar and that is so, so ugly. William, Harry, and Kate were such a happy little trio and it got totally ruined. With all that going on – and there is other stuff going on that is not in the public domain – are they at their absolute happiest? No. Their kids bring them a lot of joy, but no,” Goldsmith remarked.

The timing of Goldsmith’s interview raised eyebrows as it was released a day after Kate shared a heartbreaking video on social media revealing her cancer diagnosis. Goldsmith took to social media to apologize for the unfortunate timing, expressing his regret and offering support to Kate and her family during this difficult time.

“As many will have seen, I am featured in Saturday’s ‘Times Magazine.’ This interview and shoot were done over a week ago and went to print before I was aware of the sad news regarding my niece Kate. My thoughts and prayers are with Kate and the wider family at this difficult time and deeply upset at the timing of this article. I hope this draws a line over the continued speculation and horrible conspiracies. Let’s give Kate, William, and the children time and show some love back,” Goldsmith wrote.

The interview has stirred mixed reactions, with some supporting Goldsmith’s defence of Kate while others criticize the public airing of family grievances. The ongoing tension between the Sussexes and the rest of the royal family continues to captivate public attention, with many speculating on the long-term implications for the monarchy.

Analysis:

The recent comments by Gary Goldsmith highlight the ongoing rift within the British royal family, particularly between Meghan Markle and the rest of the royals. This incident underscores several sociopolitical and cultural dynamics that influence public perceptions and the internal dynamics of the royal family.

From a political perspective, Goldsmith’s remarks reflect the broader public debate surrounding the royal family’s role in contemporary Britain. The monarchy faces scrutiny not only for its traditional role but also for its members’ conduct and public statements. Goldsmith’s defence of Kate and criticism of Meghan can be seen as part of a larger effort to preserve the monarchy’s image amidst increasing calls for transparency and accountability.

Sociologically, Goldsmith’s comments highlight the complexities of familial relationships within the royal family. The allegations of racism against Kate have added a new dimension to the public’s understanding of the royal family’s internal dynamics. Goldsmith’s vehement defence of Kate and his dismissal of Meghan’s claims as unfounded suggest a deep-seated loyalty to family members who align with traditional royal values.

Economically, Goldsmith’s criticism of Harry and Meghan’s pursuit of financial independence in America points to the tension between traditional royal duties and modern economic realities. The Sussexes’ move to America and their commercial ventures have raised questions about the appropriate balance between personal financial autonomy and the expectations of royal service.

From a gender perspective, the public feud involving prominent female figures within the royal family—Kate and Meghan—brings attention to the unique pressures and expectations placed on royal women. The scrutiny of their behaviour, relationships, and public statements reflects broader societal attitudes towards women in positions of power and influence.

Race and minority perspectives are also crucial in understanding this incident. Meghan Markle, as a biracial woman, has brought issues of race and diversity to the forefront of royal discourse. Goldsmith’s dismissal of Meghan’s claims of racism against Kate as unfounded and offensive highlights the ongoing challenges in addressing racial issues within traditionally homogeneous institutions like the British monarchy.

In conclusion, Gary Goldsmith’s recent comments about Meghan Markle and his defence of Princess Kate illustrate the intricate interplay of political, sociological, economic, gender, and racial dynamics within the royal family. This incident serves as a microcosm of the broader societal debates surrounding the monarchy and its place in modern Britain.