Harry and Meghan encourage voter registration, sparking backlash from royal commentators

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle are facing criticism after encouraging Americans to register to vote ahead of the 2024 United States election. The couple, who now reside in California, shared the message via their Archewell Foundation on National Voter Registration Day. Their statement emphasized the importance of civic engagement, asserting that it plays a key role in creating a more just and equitable society, regardless of political affiliation. This call for Harry and Meghan voter registration has sparked mixed reactions from the public and royal commentators alike.

The 2024 US presidential election, scheduled for November 5, 2024, has drawn significant attention, with Vice President Kamala Harris and former President Donald Trump contending for the White House. As prominent public figures, Harry and Meghan’s involvement in urging voter participation has sparked a debate about their role in American politics, especially given their royal titles.

Royal commentator Rupert Bell expressed his disapproval, stating, “They are the Duke and Duchess of Sussex, and the last I looked, there aren’t any royal titles in America.” Bell added that while Meghan may see herself as a political advocate, she cannot expect to hold any official status in the American political system due to her royal title. This sentiment reflects broader concerns about the implications of Harry and Meghan voter registration efforts on their royal legacy and public perception.

This isn’t the first time the couple has been criticized for their involvement in political matters. Since stepping back from royal duties, Harry and Meghan have increasingly used their platform to address social and political issues. However, their latest call to action has once again stirred controversy, with some questioning whether they should engage in the American electoral process.

The Archewell Foundation’s statement, however, steered clear of aligning with any specific political party, instead promoting the broader message of civic responsibility. It read, “At the Archewell Foundation, we recognize that civic engagement, no matter one’s political party, is at the heart of a more just and equitable world.”

Despite this nonpartisan stance, the couple’s involvement in US politics continues to draw mixed reactions from both royal watchers and political commentators. Critics argue that their royal status, albeit unofficial in the United States, complicates their participation in political advocacy. On the other hand, supporters see their efforts as a way to encourage civic duty and participation in democracy, aligning with the goals of Harry and Meghan voter registration initiatives.

Analysis

Political: Harry and Meghan’s recent involvement in the US election raises significant questions about the intersection of royal status and political advocacy. The couple’s encouragement of voter registration aligns with their broader message of promoting social justice, but it has also triggered criticism from those who believe their royal titles should prevent them from getting involved in American politics. While they no longer serve as working royals, their association with the British monarchy makes their political statements more scrutinized, particularly on matters outside of the UK. 

Their activism speaks to larger trends in celebrity engagement with political issues. As public figures with a global platform, they can influence a wide audience, but the political implications of their involvement differ from those of typical American activists. Meghan, an American citizen, may feel a natural connection to encouraging civic participation in her home country, but Harry’s British heritage adds layers of complexity to their message. 

Social: From a social perspective, Harry and Meghan’s call to action highlights the evolving role of modern royals and high-profile figures in civic life. Traditionally, the British royal family has remained apolitical, maintaining neutrality in public matters. However, Harry and Meghan’s decision to distance themselves from royal duties has enabled them to become more outspoken on issues such as mental health, racial justice, and political participation.

The couple’s advocacy for voter registration can be viewed as an extension of their desire to use their platform for positive change. In an age where social media amplifies political discourse, figures like Harry and Meghan wield considerable influence. Supporters of the couple argue that their efforts to promote voter participation contribute to a more engaged and informed society. 

Racial: Race plays an implicit role in Harry and Meghan’s activism, particularly given Meghan’s biracial identity. Throughout their time as public figures, the couple has spoken about their experiences with racism and their desire to combat systemic inequality. Their decision to promote voter registration may be seen as an extension of this commitment to equity and justice. 

Historically, marginalized communities in the United States, including racial minorities, have faced barriers to voting. By encouraging Americans to register to vote, Harry and Meghan may be signalling their support for efforts to ensure that all citizens, particularly those from historically disenfranchised communities, have a voice in the democratic process.

Gender: Meghan’s role in political advocacy also touches on gender dynamics, as women in public life often face more scrutiny than their male counterparts. As a prominent woman of colour, Meghan has frequently been subjected to harsh criticism, both in the media and from commentators. Her involvement in promoting voter registration may be seen as an assertion of her agency and commitment to using her platform for the causes she believes in.

Her decision to speak out on political issues is consistent with a growing trend of female public figures who are increasingly taking stances on important social and political matters. By doing so, Meghan challenges traditional expectations of women in public life, particularly those associated with royal titles.

Economic: While Harry and Meghan’s promotion of civic engagement does not directly address economic issues, their message may resonate with voters concerned about the economic future of the country. The 2024 US election will undoubtedly hinge on key economic issues, including inflation, job creation, and social welfare programs. Encouraging voter participation ensures that more Americans have a say in shaping the economic policies that will impact their lives.

The Archewell Foundation’s focus on creating a more just and equitable world could also be interpreted as aligning with economic justice initiatives, including efforts to reduce income inequality and ensure that marginalized communities have access to economic opportunities. Their advocacy for voter registration is, therefore, a means of amplifying the voices of those who may have historically been excluded from the political process.